FACTS:
The petitioner corporation filed with the Bureau of Internal Revenue its annual
corporate income tax return for the calendar year ending December 31, 1981
reporting a net loss of P2,957,142.00. In the said return, the petitioner
corporation declared as creditable all taxes withheld at source by various
withholding agents. The withholding agents paid and remitted the amounts
representing taxes on rental, commission and consultancy income of the
petitioner corporation to the Bureau of Internal Revenue from February to
December 1981.
In
a letter dated December 29, 1983 addressed to CIR, the petitioner corporation
filed a claim for refund inasmuch as it had no tax liability against which to
credit the amounts withheld. Pending action of the respondent Commissioner on
its claim for refund, the petitioner corporation, on April 13, 1984, filed a
petition for review with CTA asking for the refund of the amounts withheld as
overpaid income taxes. On January 27, 1988, the respondent CTA dismissed the
petition for review after a finding that the two-year period within which the
petitioner corporation's claim for refund should have been filed had already
prescribed pursuant to Section 292 of the National Internal Revenue Code of
1977, as amended.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the claim for refund was filed on time
RULING:
YES. Crucial in the resolution of the instant case is the interpretation of the
phraseology "from the date of payment of the tax" in the context of
Section 230 on Recovery of tax erroneously or illegally collected.
A
correct application of the Gibbs case according to the court is that “a
taxpayer whose income is withheld at source will be deemed to have paid his tax
liability at the end of the tax year. It is from when the same falls due at the
his latter date then, or when the two-year prescriptive period under Section
306 of the Revenue Code starts to run with respect to payments effected through
the withholding tax system..”
The
aforequoted ruling presents two alternative reckoning dates, (1) the end of the
tax year; and (2) when the tax liability falls due. In the instant case, it is
undisputed that the petitioner corporation's withholding agents had paid the
corresponding taxes withheld at source to the Bureau of Internal Revenue from
February to December 1981. Petitioner corporation is not claiming a refund of
overpaid withholding taxes, per se. It is asking for the recovery the
refundable or creditable amount determined upon the petitioner corporation's
filing of the its final adjustment tax return on or before 15 April 1982 when
its tax liability for the year 1981 fell due. The petitioner corporation's
taxable year is on a calendar year basis, hence, with respect to the 1981
taxable year, ACCRA had until 15 April 1982 within which to file its final
adjustment return. The petitioner corporation duly complied with this
requirement
Anent
claims for refund, section 8 of Revenue Regulation No. 13-78 issued by the
Bureau of Internal Revenue requires that:
Section
8. Claims for tax credit or refund — Claims for tax credit or refund of income
tax deducted and withheld on income payments shall be given due course only
when it is shown on the return that the income payment received was declared as
part of the gross income and the fact of withholding is established by a copy
of the statement, duly issued by the payor to the payee (BIR Form No. 1743-A)
showing the amount paid and the amount of tax withheld therefrom.
The
term "return" in the case of domestic corporations like ACCRA refers
to the final adjustment return. It bears emphasis at this point that the
rationale in computing the two-year prescriptive period with respect to the
petitioner corporation's claim for refund from the time it filed its final
adjustment return is the fact that it was only then that ACCRA could ascertain
whether it made profits or incurred losses in its business operations. The
"date of payment", therefore, in ACCRA's case was when its tax
liability, if any, fell due upon its filing of its final adjustment return on
April 15, 1982.
No comments:
Post a Comment