FACTS:
By virtue of a decision of the Court of Tax Appeals, the CIR was ordered to
refund to the Cebu Portland Cement Company the amount of P359,408.98,
representing overpayments of ad valorem taxes on cement produced and sold by it
after October 1957. The private respondent then moved for a writ of execution to
enforce the said judgment The motion was opposed by the petitioner on the
ground that the private respondent had an outstanding sales tax liability to
which the judgment debt had already been credited. In fact, it was stressed,
there was still a balance owing on the sales taxes in the amount of P
4,789,279.85 plus 28% surcharge.
ISSUE:
Whether or not assessment of taxes can be enforced even if it is a subject of a
pending case or it is still being contested
RULING:
The argument that the assessment cannot as yet be enforced because it is still
being contested loses sight of the urgency of the need to collect taxes as
"the lifeblood of the government." If the payment of taxes could be
postponed by simply questioning their validity, the machinery of the state
would grind to a halt and all government functions would be paralyzed. That is
the reason why, save for the exception already noted, the Tax Code provides:
Sec.
291. Injunction not available to
restrain collection of tax. — No court shall have authority to grant an
injunction to restrain the collection of any national internal revenue tax, fee
or charge imposed by this Code.
It
goes without saying that this injunction is available not only when the
assessment is already being questioned in a court of justice but more so if, as
in the instant case, the challenge to the assessment is still-and only-on the
administrative level. There is all the more reason to apply the rule here
because it appears that even after crediting of the refund against the tax
deficiency, a balance of more than P 4 million is still due from the private
respondent.
No comments:
Post a Comment