FACTS:
1. On February 20, 1981, Catalina Quilala executed a
“Donation of Real Property Inter Vivos" in favor of Violeta Quilala over a
parcel of land located in Sta. Cruz, Manila, containing an area of 94 square
meters, and registered in her name under Transfer Certificate of Title No.
17214 of the Register of Deeds for Manila.
2. The deed of donation was registered with the Register
of Deeds and, in due course, TCT No. 17214 was cancelled and TCT No. 143015 was
issued in the name of Violeta Quilala. On November 7, 1983, Catalina Quilala
died. Violeta Quilala likewise died on May 22, 1984.
3. Petitioner Ricky Quilala alleges that he is the surviving
son of Violeta Quilala.
4. The trial court found that the deed of donation,
although signed by both Catalina and Violeta, was acknowledged before a notary
public only by the donor, Catalina.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the signing on the wrong side of the page of the document
invalidates it?
RULING:
No. The lack of an acknowledgment by the donee before the notary public does
not also render the donation null and void. The instrument should be treated in
its entirety. It cannot be considered a private document in part and a public
document in another part. The fact that it was acknowledged before a notary
public converts the deed of donation in its entirety a public instrument. The
fact that the donee was not mentioned by the notary public in the
acknowledgment is of no moment. To be sure, it is the conveyance that should be
acknowledged as a free and voluntary act. In any event, the donee signed on the
second page, which contains the Acknowledgment only. Her acceptance, which is
explicitly set forth on the first page of the notarized deed of donation, was
made in a public instrument.
No comments:
Post a Comment