Topic: Determination of
Appropriate bargain unit
FACTS:
On October 5, 1990, petitioner union filed before the
Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) a Petition for District Certification
or Certification Election among the supervisors and exempt employees of the SMC
Magnolia Poultry Products Plants of Cabuyao, San Fernando and Otis.
Med-Arbiter Danilo L. Reynante issued an Order ordering the
conduct of certification among the supervisors and exempt employees of the SMC
Magnolia Poultry Products Plants of Cabuyao, San Fernando and Otis as one
bargaining unit.
San Miguel Corporation filed a Notice of Appeal with Memorandum
on Appeal, pointing out, among others, the Med-Arbiters error in grouping
together all three (3) separate plants, Otis, Cabuyao and San Fernando, into
one bargaining unit, and in including supervisory levels 3 and above whose
positions are confidential in nature.
Respondent, Undersecretary Laguesma, granted respondent
companys Appeal and ordered the remand of the case to the Med-Arbiter of origin
for determination of the true classification of each of the employees sought to
be included in the appropriate bargaining unit
and directed the conduct of separate certification elections among the
supervisors ranked as supervisory levels 1 to 4 (S1 to S4) and the exempt
employees in each of the three plants at Cabuyao, San Fernando and Otis.
ISSUE/S:
1.WON Supervisory employees 3 and 4 and the exempt employees of
the company are considered confidential employees, hence ineligible from
joining a union.
2. If they are not confidential employees, do the employees of the
three plants constitute an appropriate single bargaining unit?
RULING:
1. NO, the said employees
do not fall within the term confidential employees who may be prohibited from
joining a union.
There is no question that the said employees, supervisors and the
exempt employees, are not vested with the powers and prerogatives to lay down
and execute management policies and/or to hire, transfer, suspend, layoff,
recall, discharge or dismiss employees. They are, therefore, not qualified to
be classified as managerial employees who, under Article 245 of the Labor Code,
are not eligible to join, assist or form any labor organization. In the very
same provision, they are not allowed membership in a labor organization of the
rank-and-file employees but may join, assist or form separate
labor organizations of their own. The only question that need be addressed is
whether these employees are properly classified as confidential employees or
not.
Confidential employees are those who (1) assist or act in a
confidential capacity, (2) to persons who formulate, determine, and effectuate
management policies in the field of labor relations. The two criteria are cumulative,
and both must be met if an employee is to be considered a confidential employee
that is, the confidential relationship must exist between the employees and his
supervisor, and the supervisor must handle the prescribed responsibilities
relating to labor relations.
Access to information which is regarded by the employer to be
confidential from the business standpoint, such as financial informationor
technical trade secrets, will not render an employee a confidential employee.
Herein listed are the functions of supervisors 3 and higher:
1. To undertake decisions to discontinue/temporarily stop shift
operations when situations require.
2. To effectively oversee the quality control function at the
processing lines in the storage of chicken and other products.
3. To administer efficient system of evaluation of products in the
outlets.
4. To be directly responsible for the recall, holding and
rejection of direct manufacturing materials.
5. To recommend and initiate actions in the maintenance of
sanitation and hygiene throughout the plant.
It is evident that whatever confidential data the questioned
employees may handle will have to relate to their functions. From the foregoing
functions, it can be gleaned that the confidential information said employees
have access to concern the employers internal business operations.
The exclusion from bargaining units of employees who, in the
normal course of their duties, become aware of management policies relating to
labor relations is a principal objective sought to be accomplished by the
confidential employee rule. The broad rationale behind this rule is that
employees should not be placed in a position involving a potential conflict of
interests. Management should not be required to handle labor relations
matters through employees who are represented by the union with the company is
required to deal and who in the normal performance of their duties may obtain
advance information of the company’s position with regard to contract
negotiations, the disposition of grievances, or other labor relations matters
2. YES, it can be a single
bargaining unit.
An appropriate bargaining unit may be defined as a group of
employees of a given employer, comprised of all or less than all of the entire
body of employees, which the collective interest of all the employees,
consistent with equity to the employer, indicate to be best suited to serve the
reciprocal rights and duties of the parties under the collective bargaining
provisions of the law.
A unit to be appropriate must effect a grouping of employees who
have substantial, mutual interests in wages, hours, working conditions and
other subjects of collective bargaining.
It is readily seen that the employees in the instant case have
community or mutuality of interest, which is the standard in determining the
proper constituency of a collective bargaining unit. It is undisputed that they
all belong to the Magnolia Poultry Division of San Miguel Corporation. This
means that, although they belong to three different plants, they perform work
of the same nature, receive the same wages and compensation, and most
importantly, share a common stake in concerted activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment