Topic: Workers-Members
of an International Organization
FACTS:
GR #
85750- the Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC) case
1.
ICMC
was one of those accredited by the Philippine government to operate the refugee
processing center in Morong, Bataan. That comes from an argument between the
Philippine government and the United Nations High Commissioner for refugees for
eventual resettlement to other countries was to be established in Bataan.
2.
ICMC
was duly registered with the United Nations Economic and Social Council and
enjoys consultative status. As an international organization rendering
voluntary and humanitarian services in the Philippines, its activities are
parallel to those of the international committee for migration and the
international of the red cross.
3.
On
July 14,1986, Trade Unions of the Philippines and Allied for certification with
the then Ministry of Labor and Employment a petition for certification election
among the rank and file members employed by ICMC. The latter opposed the
petition on the ground that it is an international organization registered with
the United Nations and hence, enjoys diplomatic immunity.
4.
The
Med-Arbiter sustained ICMC and dismissed the petition for each of jurisdiction.
On appeal by TUPAS, Director Calleja, reversed the Med-arbiter’s decision and
ordered the immediate conduct of a certification election. ICMC then sought the
immediate dismissal of the TUPAS petition for certification election involving
the immunity expressly granted but the same was denied. With intervention of
department of foreign affairs who was legal interest in the outcome of this
case, the second division gave due to the ICMC petition and required the
submittal of memoranda by the parties.
GR #
89331- the IRRI case
1.
The
International Rice Research Institute was a fruit of memorandum of
understanding between the Philippine government and the Ford and Rochefeller
Foundations. It was intended to be an autonomous, philanthropic tax-free,
non-profit, non stock organization designed to carry out the principal
objective of conducting “ basic research on the rice plant.”
2.
It
was organized and registered with the SEC as a private corporation subject to
all laws and regulations. However, by virtue of P.D no. 1620, IRRI was granted
the status, prerogatives, privileges and immunities of an international
organization.
3.
The
Kapisanan filed a petition for direct certification election with regional
office of the Department of Labor and Employment. IRRI opposed the petition
invoking Pres. Decree no.1620 conferring upon it the status of an international
organization and granting it immunity from all civil, criminal, and
administrative proceedings under Philippine laws. The Med-Arbiter upheld the
opposition on the basis of PD 1620 and dismissed the petition for direct
certification.
4.
On
appeal by BLR Director, set aside the med-arbiter’s decision and contends that
immunities and privileges granted to IRRI do not include exemption from
coverage of our labor laws.
ISSUE:
1.
GR
# 85750- the ICMC case: Whether or not the grant of diplomatic privileges and
immunities to ICMC extends to immunity from the application of Philippine labor
laws?
2.
GR
no. 89331- the IRRI case: Whether or not the Secretary of Labor committed grave
abuse of discretion in dismissing the petition for certification election filed
by Kapisanan?
RULING: Both ICMC and IRRI
are outside the coverage of Labor Relations law.
The grant of diplomatic privileges and
immunities to ICMC extends to immunity from the application of Philippine labor
laws, because it is clearly necessitated by their international character and
respective purposes which is to avoid the danger of partiality and interference
by the host country in their internal workings.
Employees are not without recourse whenever
there are disputes to be settled because each specialized agency shall make
provision for appropriate modes of settlement of disputes out of contracts or
other disputes of private character to which the specialized agency is a party.
Moreover, pursuant to article IV of memorandum of abuse of privilege by ICMC,
the government is free to withdraw the privileges and immunities accorded.
No grave abuse of discretion may be imputed
to respondent secretary of labor in his assumption of appellate jurisdiction,
contrary to Kapisanan’s allegation, hence, any party to an election may appeal
the order or results of the elections as determined by the med-arbiter directly
to the secretary of labor and employment on the ground that the rules and
regulations or parts thereof established by the secretary of labor and
employment for the conduct of the election have been violated.
DISPOSITIVE: Wherefore, petition granted in ICMC case and in IRRI case,
the petition was dismissed.
DOCTRINE:
The immunity granted being
"from every form of legal process except in so far as in any particular
case they have expressly waived their immunity," it is inaccurate to state
that a certification election is beyond the scope of that immunity for the
reason that it is not a suit against ICMC.
A certification election cannot
be viewed as an independent or isolated process. It could tugger off a series
of events in the collective bargaining process together with related incidents
and/or concerted activities, which could inevitably involve ICMC in the
"legal process," which includes "any penal, civil and
administrative proceedings."
No comments:
Post a Comment